The Bishops' statement says the decision to suspend the chief justice appears to them, and to many fair-minded people, to go against the independence of the judiciary.

"The court should be allowed to complete its business and establish the freedom of the truth," the Bishops' stament said.

"Under this principle of the separation of powers the three arms of government are expected to respect each others' independence and to co-exist in their duties and responsibilities for the common good of the people."

The statement says Papua New Guinea is already facing problems of corruption, poverty, unemployment, law and order, and many more and it is not a time for political instability and infighting.

"We appeal to all involved in this dispute to place the peace and good of the nation above self-interest."

The Papua New Guinea government has now lifted the suspension of the Chief Justice saying the move was in the national interest to prevent a constitutional crisis.

Source

• The National
• The West Australian
• Image: Australia Network News

In the Harkness Henry Lecture, delivered at Waikato University last month, Dame Sian made apparent references to the Government's criminal justice reforms.

She said control of court processes through new rules was seen by politicians as an opportunity to reduce prison populations and move cases through the court process faster through settlements and guilty pleas and so reduce costs and promote efficiency. "But if we value the independence of the courts and access to them as constitutional goods, it's hard not to be uneasy that the boundaries between executive and judicial responsibility are often not directly confronted," she said.

"It is not always easy to appreciate that proposals which seem quite innocent or efficient or pragmatic may trample on basic principle," she said.

This is not the first time the Chief Justice has spoken out. Earlier this year she floated the idea of releasing prisoners early to relieve overcrowding, and suggested punitive sentencing was often not the best option for reform.

At that time Justice Minister, Simon Power, criticised her for speaking publicly on policy matters. "It is the judiciary's job to apply the law as set by Parliament," he said. "This Government was elected on this sentencing policy. Judges are appointed to apply it."

Co-leader of the Maori Party, Dr Pita Sharples, has welcomed the fresh thinking articulated by the Chief Justice of New Zealand, in her speech.

"I would recommend her speech to all New Zealanders, as a thoughtful account of the 'fundamentals' required in a constitutional conversation," he said.

Commentator Andrea Vance says the aim of the reforms is "to free up thousands of court sitting hours and save about $25 million over five years."

The reforms had an almost 10-year journey, beginning with a Law Commission report in 2001, a further two reports, 16 discussion papers, the drafting of a bill, and more consultation with the judiciary and lawyers.

Source:

• TVNZ
• Stuff.co.nz
• Voxy.co.nz
• Image Liberation