For the first time in the history of the world, all of humanity, informed by the unprecedented reach of digital technology, has come together, focused on the same existential threat, consumed by the same fears and uncertainties, eagerly anticipating the same, as yet unrealized, promises of medical science.

In a single season, civilization has been brought low by a microscopic parasite 10,000 times smaller than a grain of salt.

COVID-19 attacks our physical bodies, but also the cultural foundations of our lives, the toolbox of community and connectivity that is for the human what claws and teeth represent to the tiger.

Our interventions to date have largely focused on mitigating the rate of spread, flattening the curve of morbidity.

There is no treatment at hand, and no certainty of a vaccine on the near horizon.

The fastest vaccine ever developed was for mumps. It took four years. COVID-19 killed 100,000 Americans in four months.

There is some evidence that natural infection may not imply immunity, leaving some to question how effective a vaccine will be, even assuming one can be found.

And it must be safe.

If the global population is to be immunized, lethal complications in just one person in a thousand would imply the death of millions.

Pandemics and plagues have a way of shifting the course of history, and not always in a manner immediately evident to the survivors.

In the 14th Century, the Black Death killed close to half of Europe's population.

A scarcity of labour led to increased wages. Rising expectations culminated in the Peasants Revolt of 1381, an inflection point that marked the beginning of the end of the feudal order that had dominated medieval Europe for a thousand years.

The COVID pandemic will be remembered as such a moment in history, a seminal event whose significance will unfold only in the wake of the crisis. It will mark this era much as the 1914 assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the stock market crash of 1929, and the 1933 ascent of Adolf Hitler became fundamental benchmarks of the last century, all harbingers of greater and more consequential outcomes.

COVID's historic significance lies not in what it implies for our daily lives.

Change, after all, is the one constant when it comes to culture.

All peoples in all places at all times are always dancing with new possibilities for life.

As companies eliminate or downsize central offices, employees work from home, restaurants close, shopping malls shutter, streaming brings entertainment and sporting events into the home, and airline travel becomes ever more problematic and miserable, people will adapt, as we've always done.

Fluidity of memory and a capacity to forget is perhaps the most haunting trait of our species. As history confirms, it allows us to come to terms with any degree of social, moral, or environmental degradation.

To be sure, financial uncertainty will cast a long shadow.

Hovering over the global economy for some time will be the sober realization that all the money in the hands of all the nations on Earth will never be enough to offset the losses sustained when an entire world ceases to function, with workers and businesses everywhere facing a choice between economic and biological survival.

Unsettling as these transitions and circumstances will be, short of a complete economic collapse, none stands out as a turning point in history.

But what surely does is the absolutely devastating impact that the pandemic has had on the reputation and international standing of the United States of America.

In a dark season of pestilence, COVID has reduced to tatters the illusion of American exceptionalism.

At the height of the crisis, with more than 2,000 dying each day, Americans found themselves members of a failed state, ruled by a dysfunctional and incompetent government largely responsible for death rates that added a tragic coda to America's claim to supremacy in the world.

For the first time, the international community felt compelled to send disaster relief to Washington.

For more than two centuries, reported the Irish Times, "the United States has stirred a very wide range of feelings in the rest of the world: love and hatred, fear and hope, envy and contempt, awe and anger. But there is one emotion that has never been directed towards the U.S. until now: pity."

As American doctors and nurses eagerly awaited emergency airlifts of basic supplies from China, the hinge of history opened to the Asian century.

No empire long endures, even if few anticipate their demise.

Every kingdom is born to die.

The 15th century belonged to the Portuguese, the 16th to Spain, 17th to the Dutch. France dominated the 18th and Britain the 19th. Bled white and left bankrupt by the Great War, the British maintained a pretence of domination as late as 1935, when the empire reached its greatest geographical extent. By then, of course, the torch had long passed into the hands of America.

In 1940, with Europe already ablaze, the United States had a smaller army than either Portugal or Bulgaria. Within four years, 18 million men and women would serve in uniform, with millions more working double shifts in mines and factories that made America, as President Roosevelt promised, the arsenal of democracy.

When the Japanese within six weeks of Pearl Harbor took control of 90 percent of the world's rubber supply, the U.S. dropped the speed limit to 35 mph to protect tires, and then, in three years, invented from scratch a synthetic-rubber industry that allowed Allied armies to roll over the Nazis.

At its peak, Henry Ford's Willow Run Plant produced a B-24 Liberator every two hours, around the clock.

Shipyards in Long Beach and Sausalito spat out Liberty ships at a rate of two a day for four years; the record was a ship built in four days, 15 hours and 29 minutes. A single American factory, Chrysler's Detroit Arsenal, built more tanks than the whole of the Third Reich. Continue reading

Pope Francis for Nobel Peace Prize

1. He's practically a rockstar

What does Pope Francis have in common with Megan Fox, Kanye West and David Bowie? They've all been on the cover of "Rolling Stone" magazine.

His appearance on the cover reflected his ability to appeal to younger generations, and hinted at the fact that he is trying to separate himself from past popes—he's not about tradition, he's about the people.

2. He's an internet sensation

Pope Francis has done what Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber couldn't do - he won the Internet. The pope was the most talked about person on social media in 2013, which just shows how big of an impact he's already made in such a short amount of time. Continue reading.

Source: Voxxi

Image: Rolling Stone

It's not 1978. Look, at one point Rolling Stone was a huge cover which granted the imprimatur of cool to anyone on its cover. Those days aren't just gone. They're long gone. Read More

Mark Binelli, author of the 7,700 word cover story, highlighted Pope Francis' universal appeal, which, he says is cutting across all major demographics, age, gender, political views and even religious affiliation.

Entiled, "Pope Francis: The times they are a-changing" reportedly goes inside what Binelli calls the pope's 'gentle revolution' and investigates why he is so different from those before him.

The Vatican has strongly criticised the Rolling Stone article in which Binelli called Benedict's papacy "disasterous" and labelled Benedict's apostolic exhortation "Sacramentum Caritatis" as "wonky", which in America reportedly means "bookish".

Acknowledging the diverse interest in Pope Francis, Vatican communications director, Fr Federico Lombardi denounced the article's negative portrayal of Emeritis Pope Benedict's pontificate.

"Unfortunately, the article disqualifies itself, falling into the usual mistake of a superficial journalism, which in order to highlight the positive aspects of Pope Francis, thinks it should describe in a negative way the pontificate of Pope Benedict, and does so with a surprising crudeness," Fr Lombardi said in a statement.

Pope Francis' popularity has also seen him appear on the front of Time, Vanity Fair, the New Yorker and perhaps most unexpectedly on the cover of "The Advocate" and LGBT focussed magazine, who also named him as their person for the year for his landmark statement "If someone is gay and seeks the Lord with good will, who am I to judge".

Sources

• Huffington Post
• News.va
• Rolling Stone
• Image: Rolling Stone