Print friendly
While parliament fiddles, Europe burns, or at least sputters into flame.
History could not be clearer.
The diversion of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict into the Sea of Azov is precisely the kind of escalation that has preceded Europe’s past cataclysms.
A great power treats a little one with contempt.
A little one responds with violence, expecting friends to come to its aid, diplomatically, economically, then militarily.
For four years, Ukraine has disobeyed the old pragmatism that if you share a border with a powerful dictator, you behave with extreme caution.
Kiev’s anti-communists flirted with Nato – with the US’s encouragement – at a time when Georgia was also flirting and the Baltic states had already joined. Vladimir Putin echoed Yeltsin, that Russia would “take this as a direct threat to the security of our country”.
When Ukraine elected a pro-western leadership in 2014, Moscow supported an uprising in its Russian-speaking eastern provinces.
There followed Moscow’s invasion of Ukrainian Crimea, and now a tightening of the noose on Ukraine’s eastern ports. Ten thousand Ukrainians have already died in this secret war.
It is classic escalation.
Ukraine’s president, Petro Poroshenko, is accused of hanging tough as he faces defeat in forthcoming elections.
On Sunday he appealed to “Ukraine’s allies to stand united” against Russia.
He did not specify who they were, or what they should do. After the invasion of Crimea, a ragbag of trade, financial and travel sanctions were imposed on Moscow by western powers.
As usual, such feel-good weapons had no effect beyond counter-productivity.
Sanctions cemented Putin more closely in power and to his cronies.
They encouraged him to ever greater mischief, backing Russian minorities in bordering states and cyber-meddling in western elections.
The thesis that impoverishment would somehow force him to cease from, as he sees it, restoring Russia’s pride was absurd. Dictatorship loves poverty.
Sanctions merely fuelled Donald Trump’s casual remark last year that Nato was “obsolete”.
What is glaring is that Europe now lacks any collective forum in which such escalations can be discussed and possibly resolved. Continue reading
- Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist, author and BBC broadcaster.
- Royal Oak Foundation
Related Posts:
News category: Analysis and Comment.
