Print friendly
My good friend John von Heyking published a marvelous book in 2016, The Form of Politics: Aristotle and Plato on Friendship.
The book argues for something important: We should recover a sense that politics is not about a partisan competition or any effort to win by defeating somebody else.
Politics is friendship—and really the highest form of friendship.
Politics is the sort of friendship that builds our communities. It is the means by which we discover and seek the common good together.
For real politics to be possible, we have to see one another as friends.
We want to be precise about that word friends.
We all know that there are many kinds of friendship.
We have close, lifelong friends.
We also have friends who are the neighbors we wave to, the people we know through work, the cashier at the local store, and a wide range of other casual acquaintances.
It is not necessary to see every friend as someone who is close or whom we know intimately. But in the most ordinary sense, when we say friend we mean someone from whom we anticipate goodwill and toward whom we wish no harm.
This is closer to the sort of friendship we are talking about in politics.
Citizenship needs to be based on that feeling of kinship with others.
There must come a point where our disagreements pause while we recognize what we share in common.
Even if our fellow citizens are not our closest or most intimate friends, our friendship with them is higher than any other because that kind of civility makes our civilization possible.
Such friendship enables us to live together in peace and build something through a common effort, even over our disagreements.
Von Heyking’s book contains a lot of wisdom, but one particularly wonderful line stays with me, because it points to the true problem that haunts our politics today.
He writes, “The purpose of politics is peace, and the regime that does not know what to do with peace will necessarily be warlike.”
In other words, the deepest problem with our politics only appears to be its warlike polarization and its never-ending conflict.
In fact, our ongoing, divisive arguments are only a symptom of the deeper, truer problem: We do not know what to do with peace. We do not know how to practice politics. We do not know how to see one another as friends.
Von Heyking’s insight arrives in a book about Plato and Aristotle and about an ancient Greek world where theater and poetry were an important part of a close-knit, free civic community.
The science of history began in that Greek world with Thucydides, who sought to understand why his city went to war with another city.
Those Greeks did go to war, of course. But they also knew what to do with peace.
War and conflict were not, as von Heyking says, “necessary” for them. They knew that the arts and what we call the humanities build up our human kinship and make us friends.
They practiced a healthy, participatory politics in a strong community.
Americans were once able to do that, too.
We were never perfect, any more than the Greeks were. But at one time we had the knack of political friendship.
It was more possible for disagreements to end at the water’s edge. Patriotism once bound us all together.
Now, patriotic expressions like waving the flag place us on one side of a political argument, and too many Americans feel as if their worst enemies are not abroad but here at home. I
have a theory about what has happened.
Greek civilization collapsed after a generations-long conflict, the Peloponnesian War.
Something similar has happened to us since the Cold War.
Not only did war and conflict become a too-easily indulged habit of mind during those years, but something else happened too. Continue reading
- Steven P. Millies is associate professor of public theology and director of The Bernardin Center at Catholic Theological Union in Chicago. His most recent book is Good Intentions: A History of Catholic Voters’ Road from Roe to Trump (Liturgical Press, 2018).
Related Posts:
News category: Analysis and Comment.
