Print friendly
Today Australia is awash with politicians who identify or are identified as Catholic.
Anthony Albanese is a Catholic.
Down the Eastern seaboard, the three state premiers, Dominic Perrottet (NSW), Daniel Andrews (Victoria) and Peter Malinauskas (SA) are Catholics.
There are many other high-profile Catholics at ministerial level and as opposition leaders.
Others, like Queensland Premier, Anastacia Palaszczuk attended a Catholic school.
Given that Catholics make up only a fifth to a quarter of the Australian population, they seem to be overrepresented right now.
That could change quickly.
But federal politics has had a run of Catholic or Catholic-educated leaders, including Liberal prime ministers Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott, Nationals Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce, and Labor Opposition Leader Bill Shorten.
Just to list their names makes it blindingly obvious that they are men (almost all men) with very different values.
They are not only spread across the political parties, but within the parties, they occupy very different places on the ideological spectrum.
Turnbull and Abbott are prime examples of deeply different values on matters like climate change and same-sex marriage, within one party.
If you look a little deeper, it is also clear that their adherence to orthodox, institutional Catholicism varies too.
That should not be surprising given the decline of Catholic church adherence in the wider community.
As only 10 per cent of Catholics are regular church attenders, it would be surprising if attendance by Catholic politicians was much different.
As more Catholics depart from official church proclamations, it would surprise if some Catholic politicians didn’t too; but when it happens in the public eye, as it did recently over the Thorburn affair with Daniel Andrews and Archbishop Peter Comensoli, it is newsworthy.
All these facts together make for an interesting relationship between church leaders, who have many different political interests to pursue with government and political leaders of the same faith.
They can try to utilise the relationship during campaigns and policy debates, or they can be embarrassed by them if they appear to be neglecting church teaching.
It also raises questions for the political leaders themselves, whose faith can give them the inside running with church leaders and with some Catholic voters during election campaigns.
During the recent federal election campaign, for instance, there was plenty of mutual cosying up between Catholic church leaders and the then Labor Opposition.
Their faith can also be an embarrassment for political leaders at times when they would prefer not to be too aligned with the official church, for example when the latter is in disrepute over institutional responses to child sexual abuse or central to tricky policy debates such as education funding.
The relationship is becoming more complicated in recent times. Continue reading
Related Posts:
News category: Analysis and Comment, Palmerston.
